Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Chess Solved More Simply

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 06:49:24 05/15/01

Go up one level in this thread


On May 15, 2001 at 07:56:49, Graham Laight wrote:

>On May 15, 2001 at 06:26:14, Ralf Elvsén wrote:
>
>>On May 15, 2001 at 06:03:11, Graham Laight wrote:
>>
>>I still say it's quicker and easier to draw a graph of strength of players
>>plotted against proportion of draws.
>>
>>Since I don't have a copy of chessbase, the graph below is based on guesswork
>>rather than actual study - but here's a quick example of what it would probably
>>look like:
>>
>>Percentage Of Draws
>>
>>
>>100 |                                             *
>>    |                                        *
>>    |                                    *
>>    |                                 *
>>    |                              *
>>75  |                           *
>>    |                        *
>>    |                     *
>>    |                  *
>>    |               *
>>50  |            *
>>    |          *
>>    |        *
>>    |      *
>>    |    *
>>25  |  *
>>    |*
>>    |
>>    |
>>    |
>>0   |
>>    ------------------------------------------------------
>>    1000       1500       2000     2500     3000      3500
>>
>>                        Elo Rating
>>
>>
>
>Check out this:
>
>http://math.bu.edu/people/mg/ratings/Draws.jpg
>
>
>Ralf,
>
>Thanks very much for drawing this work to my attention!
>
>Since it's done by the chairman of the USCF (home page =
>http://math.bu.edu/people/mg/ ), I think we can assume that it's a good quality
>study.
>
>The exciting thing (from the point of view of "solving chess" or "playing
>perfect chess") point of view is that, above 2200 Elo, the proportion of draws
>shoots up very sharply above 2200 Elo - implying that the limits of chess are
>being approached quite rapidly now.
>
>Just to describe the graph (which you can see for yourself by following Ralf's
>link above) approximately, the draw proportion starts at 15% (presumably because
>players are unable to obtain a win), drops to 8% at 650 Elo, rises steadily from
>there to 25% at 2200 Elo, then shoots up rapidly to 48% at 2700 Elo.
>
>This would imply that the limit of chess is less than 3700 (because the graph is
>rising sharply at the end) - so my original guess (2 posts back) of 3500 was not
>too bad!
>
>-g


I think the conclusion is wrong.  Draws are offered and accepted for reasons
beyond "this position is known or proven to be a draw."  The higher your rating,
the more likely you are to win an event before the last round, then offer a
quick draw to take the money and run...  Or in a match, to save mental energy
in a drawish-looking opening.

I'll bet there are more draws (at the 2600+ level) that are 30 moves are less
than there are draws of 31 moves and longer.  Which means the conclusion about
2600+ players nearly playing perfect is badly flawed.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.