Author: Frank Quisinsky
Date: 11:21:14 05/16/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 16, 2001 at 13:58:51, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On May 16, 2001 at 13:07:40, Frank Quisinsky wrote: > >>The protocol is free. >>So GUI programmer can use the protocol and programmers the engine protocol. > >Making an implementation without being able to test? I don't >think so... > >>>You cannot make a native engine for Chessbase, as they do not >>>publish how to do it. >> >>This is the problem. I hope I understand your message correct. >>More interesting is that the protocol from Chess-Base is also free, like UCI >and for sure WinBoard :-) > >They publish how bad they messed up their adapter. They do NOT publish >information on how to make a native engine. > >Faile is more than 150 points stronger when being used as a native >engine. My program is based on Faile, so I find that a VERY interesting >statistic. > >>So I hope that we get not other protocols. Better GUI programmers make here >>programs more and better compatible to WinBoard and or use UCI ! > >WinBoard 130 UCI 5 > >What do you want to support? > >-- >GCP I aggreed Deep Full with you :-) Little correction: WinBoard (in my list 134 programs, but I have not all). UCI 7 + 6-8 in the next editions, but here with an other name, WinBoard is not the right name. But I try that all programs also are compatible to WinBoard. I think the most are compatible to WinBoard. I make support for all chess products, also Hiarcs 1 (nice GUI) or Tjes ... Best Frank
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.