Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Is a third native concept important, questions for a new poll ?

Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto

Date: 10:58:51 05/16/01

Go up one level in this thread


On May 16, 2001 at 13:07:40, Frank Quisinsky wrote:

>The protocol is free.
>So GUI programmer can use the protocol and programmers the engine protocol.

Making an implementation without being able to test? I don't
think so...

>>You cannot make a native engine for Chessbase, as they do not
>>publish how to do it.
>
>This is the problem. I hope I understand your message correct.
>More interesting is that the protocol from Chess-Base is also free, like UCI >and for sure WinBoard :-)

They publish how bad they messed up their adapter. They do NOT publish
information on how to make a native engine.

Faile is more than 150 points stronger when being used as a native
engine. My program is based on Faile, so I find that a VERY interesting
statistic.

>So I hope that we get not other protocols. Better GUI programmers make here
>programs more and better compatible to WinBoard and or use UCI !

WinBoard 130  UCI 5

What do you want to support?

--
GCP



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.