Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Never Say "Impossible"

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 13:07:11 05/16/01

Go up one level in this thread


On May 16, 2001 at 15:10:33, J. Wesley Cleveland wrote:

>On May 16, 2001 at 14:07:18, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On May 16, 2001 at 13:05:13, J. Wesley Cleveland wrote:
>>
>>>On May 15, 2001 at 22:11:15, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>>
>>>>On May 15, 2001 at 12:18:43, J. Wesley Cleveland wrote:
>>>>
>>>[snip]
>>>
>>>>>>First, how do you conclude 10^25?  assuming alpha/beta and sqrt(N)?
>>>>>
>>>>>It is a classic alpha-beta search with a transposition table large enough to
>>>>>hold *all* positions found in the search. I'm guessing at the number of
>>>>>positions, but I feel that the same logic should hold, as only positions with
>>>>>one side playing perfectly would be seen.
>>>>
>>>>I don't follow.  We know that within the 50 move rule, the longest game that
>>>>can be played is something over 10,000 plies.  IE 50 moves, then a pawn push
>>>>or capture, then 50 more, etc.  Eventually you run out of pieces and it is a
>>>>draw.  But 38^10000 and 10^25 seem to have little in common.  The alpha/beta
>>>>algorithm is going to search about 38^50000 nodes to search that tree to max
>>>>depth of 10,000.
>>>
>>>Look at it another way. The only positions that are visited by an alpha/beta
>>>search (with perfect move ordering) are those where one side plays perfectly.
>>>The question is what fraction of the total number of positions that is.
>>>
>>
>>The precise formula is:
>>
>>    N = W^floor(D/2) + W^ceil(D/2) for all D.  floor means round down in integer
>>math, ceil means round up.  For the cases where D is even:
>>
>>    N = 2 * W^(D/2)  which is 2 * sqrt(minimax).
>>
>>If you assume that the total number of positions is roughly 2^168, then you
>>get 2 * sqrt(2^168) or 2 * 2^84.  Which is fairly close to the number of atoms
>>in the universe.
>
>2^84 = 1.9*10^25 If these were atoms, it would be 32 moles, or about 1kg of
>silicon.


I discovered that I was having a small overflow problem on my calculator.  It
told me that 2^84 was roughly 10^81, which is wrong.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.