Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 23:29:46 05/17/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 18, 2001 at 01:26:51, Uri Blass wrote: [snip] >I agree with the idea except that 168 is too much and you should use 155 bit >numbers. > >My counting program proved that the number of legal positions is less than 2^155 Do you actually have a 155 bit encoding for chess positions? If so, I would be keenly interested to see it. [snip]
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.