Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Where is the proof that CM8000 is weaker than CM6000?

Author: stuart taylor

Date: 17:51:46 05/19/01

Go up one level in this thread


On May 19, 2001 at 19:12:10, Graham Banks wrote:

>On May 19, 2001 at 15:34:15, william penn wrote:
>
>>i suspect that cm6555 would still score among the top three, even against the
>>best and newest programs. Cm8000 is a rip-off since there is a noticable
>>decrease in strength from the previous more strong version 6000
>
>Has anybody played the two off against each other over a significant number of
>games?
>Are the results of matches against other top programs comparatively worse or are
>you just looking at the  SSDF Deep Fritz result?
>I'd like to hear the informed opinions of others also, but any assumption must
>be backed up by strong evidence.
>Graham.


There's no end to reports from members of this forum who have played CM8000
against all other programs (incl.CM.6000) in all kinds of settings (and other
tournaments, matches too), and It's ALWAYS showing CM8000 to be just TOOOO weak
to really get very far at all.
Why? is everyone trying so tirelessly to malign CM8000, one after the other,
without fail, and to say lies also?
S.Taylor



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.