Author: stuart taylor
Date: 03:10:13 05/20/01
Go up one level in this thread
>>>I'm sorry if you I read things wrongly, but I thought it was quite obvious to >>>daily readers of this forum. >>>There are countless examples, so don't say what I'm missing out when I just >>>quote one recent example, which is that CM8000 got a minus score against Junior >>>5, whereas CM6000 beat Junior 5, 2-0.[both are in official testings] >>> I could dig up much much more, if I spent some time over it. >>>S.Taylor >> >>You make all these statements yet your first post; >>http://www.icdchess.com/forums/1/message.shtml?170600 >>in this thread indicates that you know nothing? >> >>Sarah. > >http://www.icdchess.com/forums/1/message.shtml?170612 >Sarah, >whew! You do your homework very well! >I was probably refering to the above post (with a slightly different heading) >for what It's worth, and, if it is the right address. >I base myself mainly on inceasent reports posted here. But they are not always >written in a bad light e.g. It was always written about as a wonderful thing >that CM8000 was doing so well against an amateur program (I think anNon, or >whatever), also how good it was against Shredder 2, (in which there was even a >hardware advantage to Shredder?) And other such things which I read not so well >into it. And as I said, 6000 did MUCH MUCH better against Junior 5 than did >8000. CORR.HARDWARE ADVANTAGE TO CM8000?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.