Author: Chessfun
Date: 03:21:50 05/20/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 20, 2001 at 06:10:13, stuart taylor wrote: > > > >>>>I'm sorry if you I read things wrongly, but I thought it was quite obvious to >>>>daily readers of this forum. >>>>There are countless examples, so don't say what I'm missing out when I just >>>>quote one recent example, which is that CM8000 got a minus score against Junior >>>>5, whereas CM6000 beat Junior 5, 2-0.[both are in official testings] >>>> I could dig up much much more, if I spent some time over it. >>>>S.Taylor >>> >>>You make all these statements yet your first post; >>>http://www.icdchess.com/forums/1/message.shtml?170600 >>>in this thread indicates that you know nothing? >>> >>>Sarah. >> >>http://www.icdchess.com/forums/1/message.shtml?170612 >>Sarah, >>whew! You do your homework very well! >>I was probably refering to the above post (with a slightly different heading) >>for what It's worth, and, if it is the right address. >>I base myself mainly on inceasent reports posted here. But they are not always >>written in a bad light e.g. It was always written about as a wonderful thing >>that CM8000 was doing so well against an amateur program (I think anNon, or >>whatever), also how good it was against Shredder 2, (in which there was even a >>hardware advantage to Shredder?) And other such things which I read not so well >>into it. And as I said, 6000 did MUCH MUCH better against Junior 5 than did >>8000. >CORR.HARDWARE ADVANTAGE TO CM8000? To late see my other LOL Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.