Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 19:45:58 05/22/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 22, 2001 at 07:26:03, Ralf Elvsén wrote: >On May 21, 2001 at 10:34:08, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On May 21, 2001 at 00:58:33, Vine Smith wrote: >> >>>I thought Crafty's choice was the most sensible of those summarized by Sune >>>Larson. I will run the position after Fritz's 21.b4 to see if Crafty has a >>>strongly negative view of what White has done. That would be important for any >>>program trying to win from this point, as failure to understand that keeping the >>>queen confined must be a priority could result in the premature release of this >>>piece for the sake of less important advantages. I'm going to use 18.9 instead >>>of Larsson's 18.8 (the Chessbase version, I'm guessing), because I prefer to >>>work from the command line. Are there any significant evaluation differences >>>between recent Crafty versions? >> >>I didn't see much in the way of eval changes in 18.9... it is mainly a more >>aggressive "book learner" with a few other minor changes. The evals should be >>pretty similar (not identical however). >> >>18.10 is more different, as bishop scoring has changed after several hours of >>GM discussion. Castling is handled a bit differently too. > >Will this affect how it evaluates bad bishops in the >endgame? This is one pretty clear weakness I think I can identify. > >Ralf That is one thing we have been working on, yes...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.