Author: Ralf Elvsén
Date: 04:26:03 05/22/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 21, 2001 at 10:34:08, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On May 21, 2001 at 00:58:33, Vine Smith wrote: > >>I thought Crafty's choice was the most sensible of those summarized by Sune >>Larson. I will run the position after Fritz's 21.b4 to see if Crafty has a >>strongly negative view of what White has done. That would be important for any >>program trying to win from this point, as failure to understand that keeping the >>queen confined must be a priority could result in the premature release of this >>piece for the sake of less important advantages. I'm going to use 18.9 instead >>of Larsson's 18.8 (the Chessbase version, I'm guessing), because I prefer to >>work from the command line. Are there any significant evaluation differences >>between recent Crafty versions? > >I didn't see much in the way of eval changes in 18.9... it is mainly a more >aggressive "book learner" with a few other minor changes. The evals should be >pretty similar (not identical however). > >18.10 is more different, as bishop scoring has changed after several hours of >GM discussion. Castling is handled a bit differently too. Will this affect how it evaluates bad bishops in the endgame? This is one pretty clear weakness I think I can identify. Ralf
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.