Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 07:34:08 05/21/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 21, 2001 at 00:58:33, Vine Smith wrote: >I thought Crafty's choice was the most sensible of those summarized by Sune >Larson. I will run the position after Fritz's 21.b4 to see if Crafty has a >strongly negative view of what White has done. That would be important for any >program trying to win from this point, as failure to understand that keeping the >queen confined must be a priority could result in the premature release of this >piece for the sake of less important advantages. I'm going to use 18.9 instead >of Larsson's 18.8 (the Chessbase version, I'm guessing), because I prefer to >work from the command line. Are there any significant evaluation differences >between recent Crafty versions? I didn't see much in the way of eval changes in 18.9... it is mainly a more aggressive "book learner" with a few other minor changes. The evals should be pretty similar (not identical however). 18.10 is more different, as bishop scoring has changed after several hours of GM discussion. Castling is handled a bit differently too.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.