Author: leonid
Date: 12:39:26 06/17/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 17, 2001 at 14:07:17, Heiner Marxen wrote: >On June 16, 2001 at 12:26:57, Steven J. Brann wrote: > >>On June 16, 2001 at 11:37:27, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On June 16, 2001 at 08:50:27, Steven J. Brann wrote: >>> >>>>On June 16, 2001 at 08:30:19, leonid wrote: >>>> >>>>>Hi! >>>>> >>>>>I am not sure how deep this position is but it look like that only strong >>>>>program will find it easy. >>>>> >>>>>[D]3K4/1Q1Q1Q2/Q1R1R1Q1/2N1N3/Q1qBNqQ1/q1qBRq1q/brnq1nrb/3kq3 w - - >>>>> >>>>>Please indicate your result. >>>>> >>>>>Thanks, >>>>>Leonid. >>>> >>>>Chessmaster 8000 finds the mate but it took longer than it usually does for your >>>>positions, 4:50 on a PIII 933. >>>> >>>>Time Depth Score Positions Moves >>>>0:00 1/3 19.45 52935 1. Nxc3+ Qcxc3 2. Rxe1+ Qxe1 3. >>>> Bxc2+ Kc1 4. Bxc3 Rxg4 5. Bxb2+ >>>> Qxb2 6. Nxf3 Qhxf3 >>>>0:27 1/4 27.23 2248065 1. Nxc3+ Qaxc3 2. Rxe1+ Qxe1 3. >>>> Bxc2+ Qxc2 4. Bxb2+ Nd3 5. Qdxd3+ >>>> Qed2 6. Nxf3 Qcxd3+ 7. Qgxd3 >>>>1:19 2/5 30.51 6857417 1. Nxc3+ Qaxc3 2. Rxe1+ Qxe1 3. >>>> Bxc2+ Qxc2 4. Bxb2+ Nd3 5. Qgxd3+ >>>> Rd2 6. Qdxf3+ Qhxf3 7. Qxf3+ Qee2 >>>> 8. Nxc4 Qexf3 9. Qxc2+ Kxc2 10. >>>> Qxa2 >>>>4:50 2/6 Mate10 25540594 1. Nxc3+ Qaxc3 2. Rxe1+ Qxe1 3. >>>> Bxc2+ Qxc2 4. Bxb2+ Nd3 5. Qgxd3+ >>>> Rd2 6. Qaxc2+ Qxc2 7. Qgxf3+ Qfxf3 >>>> 8. Qdxf3+ Qxf3 9. Qxf3+ Qe2 10. >>>> Qfxe2# >>>>8:43 3/7 Mate10 41570060 1. Nxc3+ Qaxc3 2. Rxe1+ Qxe1 3. >>>> Bxc2+ Qxc2 4. Bxb2+ Nd3 5. Qgxd3+ >>>> Rd2 6. Qaxc2+ Qxc2 7. Qgxf3+ Qfxf3 >>>> 8. Qdxf3+ Qxf3 9. Qxf3+ Qe2 10. >>>> Qfxe2# >>>> >>>>Steve >>> >>>I suspect that you should try to increase the value of the ss >>>parameter(selective search). >>> >>>Using the default value is a mistake and I know that chessmaster6000 is usually >>>faster with ss=10 so I believe that the same is truth for chessmaster8000. >>> >>>My experience tells me that with ss=10 I never see depthes like 2/5 or 3/7 but >>>only 1/5 and usually also 1/7 so I guess that you used the default ss=6. >>> >>>Uri >> >>Yes, I usually use the default personality with 16MB hash to solve mate problems >>like this. I have a personality I've been experimenting with, CM8999, which >>uses SS=10 and 16MB hash. It solves the mate in 30 seconds less time: >> >>Time Depth Score Positions Moves >>0:01 1/3 19.11 75985 1. Rxe1+ Qxe1 2. Nxc3+ Qcxc3 3. >> Bxc2+ Kc1 4. Bxc3 Rxg4 5. Bxb2+ >> Qxb2 6. Nxf3 Qhxf3 >>0:12 1/4 22.32 1037835 1. Rxe1+ Qxe1 2. Nxc3+ Qexc3 3. >> Bxc2+ Kc1 4. Qfxf4+ Bxf4 5. Bxc3 >>0:19 1/4 26.54 1599743 1. Nxc3+ Qaxc3 2. Rxe1+ Qxe1 3. >> Bxc2+ Qxc2 4. Bxb2+ Nd3 5. Qdxd3+ >> Rd2 6. Qxc2+ Qxc2 7. Qxf3+ Qhxf3 >> 8. Nxf3 Bxe6 9. Nxe6 >>1:41 1/5 30.69 8989417 1. Nxc3+ Qaxc3 2. Rxe1+ Qxe1 3. >> Bxc2+ Qxc2 4. Bxb2+ Nd3 5. Qgxd3+ >> Rd2 6. Qgxf3+ Qhxf3 7. Qxf3+ Qee2 >> 8. Nxc4 Qfxf3 9. Rxe2 Qxe2 >>4:20 1/6 Mate10 25762076 1. Nxc3+ Qaxc3 2. Rxe1+ Qxe1 3. >> Bxc2+ Qxc2 4. Bxb2+ Nd3 5. Qgxd3+ >> Rd2 6. Qaxc2+ Qxc2 7. Qdxf3+ Qfxf3 >> 8. Qgxf3+ Qxf3 9. Qxf3+ Qe2 10. >> Qfxe2# >>6:19 1/7 Mate10 37976728 1. Nxc3+ Qaxc3 2. Rxe1+ Qxe1 3. >> Bxc2+ Qxc2 4. Bxb2+ Nd3 5. Qgxd3+ >> Rd2 6. Qaxc2+ Qxc2 7. Qdxf3+ Qfxf3 >> 8. Qgxf3+ Qxf3 9. Qxf3+ Qe2 10. >> Qfxe2# >> >>Steve > >And since Chest found that "there is no mate in 9", we now also know, >that the above mate is shortest possible. >(On a K7/600 with 350 MB hash Chest used 10.5 hours for the above.) > >Cheers, >Heiner Thanks, Heiner! Before I indicate that it could be mate in 10 but now I wrote it as a sure thing. Cheers, Leonid.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.