Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 06:45:21 06/19/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 19, 2001 at 09:01:32, Bas Hamstra wrote: >>So to get a real impression of the strength, play it in a match. >>I have good reasons to believe that tactically you will get your >>ass kicked. > >Wow, wait a minute, I can tell you, in Blitz games, the normal Crafty kicks >Tao's butt on 2x faster hardware. For FriarTuck this seems much less the case. >Tao won a couple and FriarTuck won a couple. Wait, I'll look it up. > >Time control 5/2 >Games 4 >Tao Celeron 466 >FriarTuck Athlon 1000 >Outcome: 2-2 > >It seems (despite the 2x slower hardware) Tao is tactically better and >FriarTuck is better in the endgame. Crafty's dam outside passers. However >that's an eval thing, not a search thing. I suggest we play a couple 30/0 games >tonight, to verify Tao is better tactically :-) Also at longer tc's I feel less >handicapped by the HW. Deal? I will want to play at least 16 games. The 4 games you quoted mean really nothing. I wanted to play more, but the operator changed the formula midway. (Yeah I did exaggerate a bit about the asskicking of course, but I wanted to say that FriarTuck really is better than 2100 FICS. :-) >Maybe we can have a conversation about what you did in the meantime, I am >interested. I am running testsuites to tune 'the magic constants' :) I wont be able to play tonight, but perhaps we can set another date? -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.