Author: Andrew Williams
Date: 07:07:23 06/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 26, 2001 at 09:57:32, Chris Carson wrote: >On June 26, 2001 at 09:31:19, Andrew Williams wrote: > >[snip] > >>That's not the point I was making. I just mean that there won't be much >>of an argument in five years. Over time, PCs will do better and better >>until we get to a point where it's not worth arguing about. So why draw >>a line here and argue about it now? >> > >We are at that point now. > Clearly we're not at the point where it's not worth arguing about it, as there are dozens of messages on this topic further down the board! >It isn't 5 years away. It is today (actually a few years ago when the 500Mhz >machines came out). This is the future with respect to thee release date for >the PII 500Mhz machines and we now have SMP programs as well. The future is >today. :) > >Again, it is just as easy for the critics (ie: "programs are 2500 or below") to >state that programs are performing at 2600 and above. I do not see why I should >be the one to wait and be silent. If you do not like my posts or this topic, >don't participate. > >If you want to argue the other side, show me the data. :) > >I do not see why I should stop if I am right? > >Best Regards, >Chris Carson I'm not saying you should stop. I was wondering why you didn't stop. Am I right that you once had a web page (maybe a place on someone else's web page?) with the human vs comp results to date? Could I suggest including the URL at the bottom of your messages, or in your profile? Andrew
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.