Author: Chris Carson
Date: 06:57:32 06/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 26, 2001 at 09:31:19, Andrew Williams wrote: [snip] >That's not the point I was making. I just mean that there won't be much >of an argument in five years. Over time, PCs will do better and better >until we get to a point where it's not worth arguing about. So why draw >a line here and argue about it now? > We are at that point now. It isn't 5 years away. It is today (actually a few years ago when the 500Mhz machines came out). This is the future with respect to thee release date for the PII 500Mhz machines and we now have SMP programs as well. The future is today. :) Again, it is just as easy for the critics (ie: "programs are 2500 or below") to state that programs are performing at 2600 and above. I do not see why I should be the one to wait and be silent. If you do not like my posts or this topic, don't participate. If you want to argue the other side, show me the data. :) I do not see why I should stop if I am right? Best Regards, Chris Carson
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.