Author: Otello Gnaramori
Date: 07:18:05 06/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 26, 2001 at 09:06:42, Andrew Williams wrote: >Over the last month, there have been a number of such huge arguments. >I've always thought that it's a bit strange to get hung up on this >question. Five years ago, it was clear that the best micro programs >were not at GM strength. And presumably if you wait five years, PC >programs will have proven beyond any doubt that they are at GM strength. >Surely the time we happen to be living in is the best and most enjoyable, >because we're perhaps seeing a moment of transition between these positions. >Why then the need to convince anybody of anything when you can just sit >there and be proved right by waiting? Is there some particular benefit to >being able to say that PC programs are GMs *now*? > >Andrew Hi Andrew, I think that one of the most interesting argument in Computer Chess Club is to observe and comment the computers achievement in this "Art" or "Sport" or "Game" ,whatever you like. Regards.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.