Author: Andrew Williams
Date: 15:47:11 07/16/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 16, 2001 at 18:20:15, Otello Gnaramori wrote:
>On July 16, 2001 at 17:51:56, Andrew Williams wrote:
>
>>On July 16, 2001 at 15:57:01, Mark Young wrote:
>>
>>>On July 16, 2001 at 13:46:25, Otello Gnaramori wrote:
>>>
>>>>On July 16, 2001 at 12:48:42, José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On July 16, 2001 at 12:19:00, Jonas Cohonas wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>[Event "Dortmund"]
>>>>>>[Site "Dortmund, Germany"]
>>>>>>[Date "2001.07.16"]
>>>>>>[Round "5"]
>>>>>>[White "Huebner(GER)"]
>>>>>>[Black "DeepFritz(C)"]
>>>>>>[Result "1/2-1/2"]
>>>>>>[WhiteElo "2612"]
>>>>>>[Opening "Ruy Lopez: closed (10...c5)"]
>>>>>>[ECO "C96"]
>>>>>>[NIC "RL.23"]
>>>>>>[Time "07:28:12"]
>>>>>>[TimeControl "7200+0"]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 d6 8.
>>>>>>c3 O-O 9. h3 Na5 10. Bc2 c5 11. d4 cxd4 12. cxd4 exd4 13. Nxd4 Bb7 14. Nf5
>>>>>>Rc8 15. Bf4 Nc4 16. b3 Ne5 17. Nd2 Re8 18. Rc1 Bf8 19. Bb1 Rxc1 20. Qxc1 b4
>>>>>>21. Qd1 d5 22. Nf1 Ng6 23. Bg5 h6 24. Bxf6 Qxf6 25. exd5 Rxe1 26. Qxe1 Bxd5
>>>>>>27. Qd2 Be6 28. Nd4 Bd7 29. Be4 Nf4 30. Ne2 Nxe2+ 31. Qxe2 Bc5 32. Ne3 Qa1+
>>>>>>33. Qd1 Qxd1+ 34. Nxd1 f5 35. Bd3 Bc8 36. Nb2 Kf7 37. Bc4+ Kf6 38. Nd3 Bd6
>>>>>>39. f4 Bb7 40. g3 a5 41. Kf2 g5 42. h4 Be4 43. hxg5+ hxg5 44. Bb5 gxf4 45.
>>>>>>gxf4 Bxd3 {Game drawn} 1/2-1/2
>>>>>
>>>>>GM Hübner was against the ropes most of the game, and also under time pressure.
>>>>>But Fritz could not resist the temptation to win a pawn, and entered an
>>>>>opposite-coloured bishop ending. The game was immediately agreed drawn, I guess
>>>>>the operator of Fritz realized what was going on and did not want to waste his
>>>>>time.
>>>>>Does anybody know the time control? From watching the game live, it is
>>>>>reasonable to assume that the first time control is 40 moves in two hours, but
>>>>>then what?
>>>>>José.
>>>>
>>>>Congratulation to Dr. Huebner, he defended well again in this second game.
>>>>The open question is how many games will he endure against the silicon monster ?
>>>>
>>>>Regards.
>>>
>>>I’m confused, the way everyone is talking, it sounds like DeepFritz is the
>>>favorite to win this match. I hear how nice the 2600+ Grandmaster played and
>>>defended against the computer.
>>>
>>
>>Your trolling is becoming somewhat tiresome. You said "the way everyone is
>>talking", when the only opinion you are working from is from Otello Gnaramori.
>>
>>This seems to be about as convincing as your "programs are only rated 2100"
>>straw man.
>>
>>Andrew
>
>Hi ,Andrew.
>The english language isn't my mother tongue, but I think that when Jose' said
>"against the ropes" meant "in difficulty" and "under time pressure" meant quite
>the same concept.
>This was just to say that it wasn't only a mine exclusive opinion that Dr.
>Hubner was struggling against the "silicon beast".
>Deep Fritz powered by dual processors at 1 Ghz and 1 GB of ram isn't exactly a
>piece of cake.
>
>Regards.
I personally wouldn't read Jose's message that way. For example, he says
nothing about the expected result of the match. But even if that *is* what
he meant, that still equals *two* posters, not "everyone", as was claimed.
I'd be interested to see if Mark wishes to deny that he is just trolling for
responses.
Cheers
Andrew
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.