Author: odell hall
Date: 16:42:43 07/16/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 16, 2001 at 16:41:33, Mark Young wrote: >On July 16, 2001 at 16:19:24, Otello Gnaramori wrote: > >>On July 16, 2001 at 15:57:01, Mark Young wrote: >> >>>On July 16, 2001 at 13:46:25, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >>> >>>>On July 16, 2001 at 12:48:42, José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba wrote: >>>> >>>>>On July 16, 2001 at 12:19:00, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>[Event "Dortmund"] >>>>>>[Site "Dortmund, Germany"] >>>>>>[Date "2001.07.16"] >>>>>>[Round "5"] >>>>>>[White "Huebner(GER)"] >>>>>>[Black "DeepFritz(C)"] >>>>>>[Result "1/2-1/2"] >>>>>>[WhiteElo "2612"] >>>>>>[Opening "Ruy Lopez: closed (10...c5)"] >>>>>>[ECO "C96"] >>>>>>[NIC "RL.23"] >>>>>>[Time "07:28:12"] >>>>>>[TimeControl "7200+0"] >>>>>> >>>>>>1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 d6 8. >>>>>>c3 O-O 9. h3 Na5 10. Bc2 c5 11. d4 cxd4 12. cxd4 exd4 13. Nxd4 Bb7 14. Nf5 >>>>>>Rc8 15. Bf4 Nc4 16. b3 Ne5 17. Nd2 Re8 18. Rc1 Bf8 19. Bb1 Rxc1 20. Qxc1 b4 >>>>>>21. Qd1 d5 22. Nf1 Ng6 23. Bg5 h6 24. Bxf6 Qxf6 25. exd5 Rxe1 26. Qxe1 Bxd5 >>>>>>27. Qd2 Be6 28. Nd4 Bd7 29. Be4 Nf4 30. Ne2 Nxe2+ 31. Qxe2 Bc5 32. Ne3 Qa1+ >>>>>>33. Qd1 Qxd1+ 34. Nxd1 f5 35. Bd3 Bc8 36. Nb2 Kf7 37. Bc4+ Kf6 38. Nd3 Bd6 >>>>>>39. f4 Bb7 40. g3 a5 41. Kf2 g5 42. h4 Be4 43. hxg5+ hxg5 44. Bb5 gxf4 45. >>>>>>gxf4 Bxd3 {Game drawn} 1/2-1/2 >>>>> >>>>>GM Hübner was against the ropes most of the game, and also under time pressure. >>>>>But Fritz could not resist the temptation to win a pawn, and entered an >>>>>opposite-coloured bishop ending. The game was immediately agreed drawn, I guess >>>>>the operator of Fritz realized what was going on and did not want to waste his >>>>>time. >>>>>Does anybody know the time control? From watching the game live, it is >>>>>reasonable to assume that the first time control is 40 moves in two hours, but >>>>>then what? >>>>>José. >>>> >>>>Congratulation to Dr. Huebner, he defended well again in this second game. >>>>The open question is how many games will he endure against the silicon monster ? >>>> >>>>Regards. >>> >>>I’m confused, the way everyone is talking, it sounds like DeepFritz is the >>>favorite to win this match. I hear how nice the 2600+ Grandmaster played and >>>defended against the computer. >>> >>>I thought a prepared Grandmaster from what I have read here at CCC would have no >>>trouble beating a top chess program. Against a prepared human I read here by the >>>experts the program will play like a weak 2100-2200 player. >>> >>>Who is the favorite in the match DeepFritz or GM Huebner? >> >>Hi, Mark. >>Please keep in account that this time Dr. Huebner is challenging a "monster" >>equipped with dual processors at 1 GHz and 1 GByte of ram. >>Then keep in account that Deep Fritz is at the first place in SSDF ratings and >>gained the challenge to the actual World Champion Kramnik in October in a more >>powerful configuration too. >>Against this powerful combination of very advanced software and hardware >>technology it's truly remarkable the effort of this human challenger. >> >>Regards > >Still confused, I read no matter how fast the hardware was, the experts said the >program would not stand a chance because all programs have the same positional >weaknesses that no amount of processing power can cure, so a prepared human and >no less a strong 2600+ Grandmaster will exploit these holes and make the program >look silly. At least that is what I have read for the experts here at CCC. I was thinking the exact same thing Mark! I think it's a case of Hypocrisy, they go around screaming computers are not grandmasters, and then Give a veteran Grandmaster a Congradulations for drawing a computer??? The depth of these Peoples ignorance is astounding!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.