Author: Mark Young
Date: 13:41:33 07/16/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 16, 2001 at 16:19:24, Otello Gnaramori wrote:
>On July 16, 2001 at 15:57:01, Mark Young wrote:
>
>>On July 16, 2001 at 13:46:25, Otello Gnaramori wrote:
>>
>>>On July 16, 2001 at 12:48:42, José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba wrote:
>>>
>>>>On July 16, 2001 at 12:19:00, Jonas Cohonas wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>[Event "Dortmund"]
>>>>>[Site "Dortmund, Germany"]
>>>>>[Date "2001.07.16"]
>>>>>[Round "5"]
>>>>>[White "Huebner(GER)"]
>>>>>[Black "DeepFritz(C)"]
>>>>>[Result "1/2-1/2"]
>>>>>[WhiteElo "2612"]
>>>>>[Opening "Ruy Lopez: closed (10...c5)"]
>>>>>[ECO "C96"]
>>>>>[NIC "RL.23"]
>>>>>[Time "07:28:12"]
>>>>>[TimeControl "7200+0"]
>>>>>
>>>>>1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 d6 8.
>>>>>c3 O-O 9. h3 Na5 10. Bc2 c5 11. d4 cxd4 12. cxd4 exd4 13. Nxd4 Bb7 14. Nf5
>>>>>Rc8 15. Bf4 Nc4 16. b3 Ne5 17. Nd2 Re8 18. Rc1 Bf8 19. Bb1 Rxc1 20. Qxc1 b4
>>>>>21. Qd1 d5 22. Nf1 Ng6 23. Bg5 h6 24. Bxf6 Qxf6 25. exd5 Rxe1 26. Qxe1 Bxd5
>>>>>27. Qd2 Be6 28. Nd4 Bd7 29. Be4 Nf4 30. Ne2 Nxe2+ 31. Qxe2 Bc5 32. Ne3 Qa1+
>>>>>33. Qd1 Qxd1+ 34. Nxd1 f5 35. Bd3 Bc8 36. Nb2 Kf7 37. Bc4+ Kf6 38. Nd3 Bd6
>>>>>39. f4 Bb7 40. g3 a5 41. Kf2 g5 42. h4 Be4 43. hxg5+ hxg5 44. Bb5 gxf4 45.
>>>>>gxf4 Bxd3 {Game drawn} 1/2-1/2
>>>>
>>>>GM Hübner was against the ropes most of the game, and also under time pressure.
>>>>But Fritz could not resist the temptation to win a pawn, and entered an
>>>>opposite-coloured bishop ending. The game was immediately agreed drawn, I guess
>>>>the operator of Fritz realized what was going on and did not want to waste his
>>>>time.
>>>>Does anybody know the time control? From watching the game live, it is
>>>>reasonable to assume that the first time control is 40 moves in two hours, but
>>>>then what?
>>>>José.
>>>
>>>Congratulation to Dr. Huebner, he defended well again in this second game.
>>>The open question is how many games will he endure against the silicon monster ?
>>>
>>>Regards.
>>
>>I’m confused, the way everyone is talking, it sounds like DeepFritz is the
>>favorite to win this match. I hear how nice the 2600+ Grandmaster played and
>>defended against the computer.
>>
>>I thought a prepared Grandmaster from what I have read here at CCC would have no
>>trouble beating a top chess program. Against a prepared human I read here by the
>>experts the program will play like a weak 2100-2200 player.
>>
>>Who is the favorite in the match DeepFritz or GM Huebner?
>
>Hi, Mark.
>Please keep in account that this time Dr. Huebner is challenging a "monster"
>equipped with dual processors at 1 GHz and 1 GByte of ram.
>Then keep in account that Deep Fritz is at the first place in SSDF ratings and
>gained the challenge to the actual World Champion Kramnik in October in a more
>powerful configuration too.
>Against this powerful combination of very advanced software and hardware
>technology it's truly remarkable the effort of this human challenger.
>
>Regards
Still confused, I read no matter how fast the hardware was, the experts said the
program would not stand a chance because all programs have the same positional
weaknesses that no amount of processing power can cure, so a prepared human and
no less a strong 2600+ Grandmaster will exploit these holes and make the program
look silly. At least that is what I have read for the experts here at CCC.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.