Author: Tanya Deborah
Date: 22:05:13 07/16/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 16, 2001 at 16:41:33, Mark Young wrote:
>On July 16, 2001 at 16:19:24, Otello Gnaramori wrote:
>
>>On July 16, 2001 at 15:57:01, Mark Young wrote:
>>
>>>On July 16, 2001 at 13:46:25, Otello Gnaramori wrote:
>>>
>>>>On July 16, 2001 at 12:48:42, José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On July 16, 2001 at 12:19:00, Jonas Cohonas wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>[Event "Dortmund"]
>>>>>>[Site "Dortmund, Germany"]
>>>>>>[Date "2001.07.16"]
>>>>>>[Round "5"]
>>>>>>[White "Huebner(GER)"]
>>>>>>[Black "DeepFritz(C)"]
>>>>>>[Result "1/2-1/2"]
>>>>>>[WhiteElo "2612"]
>>>>>>[Opening "Ruy Lopez: closed (10...c5)"]
>>>>>>[ECO "C96"]
>>>>>>[NIC "RL.23"]
>>>>>>[Time "07:28:12"]
>>>>>>[TimeControl "7200+0"]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 d6 8.
>>>>>>c3 O-O 9. h3 Na5 10. Bc2 c5 11. d4 cxd4 12. cxd4 exd4 13. Nxd4 Bb7 14. Nf5
>>>>>>Rc8 15. Bf4 Nc4 16. b3 Ne5 17. Nd2 Re8 18. Rc1 Bf8 19. Bb1 Rxc1 20. Qxc1 b4
>>>>>>21. Qd1 d5 22. Nf1 Ng6 23. Bg5 h6 24. Bxf6 Qxf6 25. exd5 Rxe1 26. Qxe1 Bxd5
>>>>>>27. Qd2 Be6 28. Nd4 Bd7 29. Be4 Nf4 30. Ne2 Nxe2+ 31. Qxe2 Bc5 32. Ne3 Qa1+
>>>>>>33. Qd1 Qxd1+ 34. Nxd1 f5 35. Bd3 Bc8 36. Nb2 Kf7 37. Bc4+ Kf6 38. Nd3 Bd6
>>>>>>39. f4 Bb7 40. g3 a5 41. Kf2 g5 42. h4 Be4 43. hxg5+ hxg5 44. Bb5 gxf4 45.
>>>>>>gxf4 Bxd3 {Game drawn} 1/2-1/2
>>>>>
>>>>>GM Hübner was against the ropes most of the game, and also under time pressure.
>>>>>But Fritz could not resist the temptation to win a pawn, and entered an
>>>>>opposite-coloured bishop ending. The game was immediately agreed drawn, I guess
>>>>>the operator of Fritz realized what was going on and did not want to waste his
>>>>>time.
>>>>>Does anybody know the time control? From watching the game live, it is
>>>>>reasonable to assume that the first time control is 40 moves in two hours, but
>>>>>then what?
>>>>>José.
>>>>
>>>>Congratulation to Dr. Huebner, he defended well again in this second game.
>>>>The open question is how many games will he endure against the silicon monster ?
>>>>
>>>>Regards.
>>>
>>>I’m confused, the way everyone is talking, it sounds like DeepFritz is the
>>>favorite to win this match. I hear how nice the 2600+ Grandmaster played and
>>>defended against the computer.
>>>
>>>I thought a prepared Grandmaster from what I have read here at CCC would have no
>>>trouble beating a top chess program. Against a prepared human I read here by the
>>>experts the program will play like a weak 2100-2200 player.
>>>
>>>Who is the favorite in the match DeepFritz or GM Huebner?
>>
>>Hi, Mark.
>>Please keep in account that this time Dr. Huebner is challenging a "monster"
>>equipped with dual processors at 1 GHz and 1 GByte of ram.
>>Then keep in account that Deep Fritz is at the first place in SSDF ratings and
>>gained the challenge to the actual World Champion Kramnik in October in a more
>>powerful configuration too.
>>Against this powerful combination of very advanced software and hardware
>>technology it's truly remarkable the effort of this human challenger.
>>
>>Regards
>
>Still confused, I read no matter how fast the hardware was, the experts said the
>program would not stand a chance because all programs have the same positional
>weaknesses that no amount of processing power can cure, so a prepared human and
>no less a strong 2600+ Grandmaster will exploit these holes and make the program
>look silly. At least that is what I have read for the experts here at CCC.
You are wrong! Kasparov have very much problems beating Deep Blue. Sincerely
the computer can calculate more than 200 millions per second!. It isn´t easy!
Top programs are definitely at GM strenght. When you need to accept this?
Maybe only when Deep Fritz can beat Huebner 6-0?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.