Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 00:20:34 05/06/98
Go up one level in this thread
On May 05, 1998 at 18:30:24, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: > It is >impossible to demand the use of an autoplayer that does NOT exist. Gambit soft price list: chess232 autoplayer --- 149 ,- DM. Over 20 programs in the ssdf-list use this autoplayer. And you call it: NON existing. I think we have to stop talking here. It does not make sense. You don't accept facts and you call things NON existing that can be bought in big computerchess-shops. It does not make sense to talk to people with those narrow-point of view. >Of course. It would be impossible, because such a universal autoplayer >exists only in your mind. Your sentence is refuted by reality. When over 20 programs USE this NON-existing autoplayer system that is available in the shops although it does not exist (heavens !!) how else can you call it but UNIVERSAL ?! If ChessBase has an autoplayer that is NOT in the shops, that is NOT used by 20 programs that is not public that is hidden, would you call this UNIVERSAL ? Maybe we have more than a language problem. Maybe we have to start by sero. 1 is looking like this because it has 1 angle. 2 is this way because it has 2 angles. 3 is looking this way because it has 3 angles ... 8 is looking this way because it has 8 angles ... they were unable to invent a sero because in stone you cannot draw round and not producing angles. Maybe this helps as a first lesson. Next lesson we teach romain-numbers.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.