Author: Jeff Lischer
Date: 10:47:44 08/24/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 24, 2001 at 13:09:01, Uri Blass wrote: >On August 24, 2001 at 07:06:51, Uri Blass wrote: > >>Here are the results by >>elostat program >> >>You can see that shredder is only 3th place micro based on the performance. >>Shredder is the world Micro champion by definition but Tiger and Rebel had a >>better performance. >> >> >>1 Deep Junior 7 : 2745 228 281 9 88.9 % 2384 22.2 % >>2 Quest (DeepFritz) : 2550 266 169 9 66.7 % 2430 44.4 % >>3 Chess Tiger 14.6 Gambit Tiger : 2499 291 229 9 55.6 % 2461 22.2 % >>4 Crafty 18.10X : 2467 291 165 9 55.6 % 2428 44.4 % >>5 Rebel : 2466 291 229 9 55.6 % 2428 22.2 % >>6 Shredder : 2466 266 249 9 66.7 % 2346 22.2 % >>7 Goliath : 2421 291 165 9 55.6 % 2382 44.4 % >>8 Gromit 3.9.5 : 2364 278 201 9 61.1 % 2285 33.3 % >>9 Ferret : 2359 291 229 9 55.6 % 2320 22.2 >>%10 Gandalf 5.0 : 2310 291 229 9 55.6 % 2271 22.2 >>% >>11 ParSOS : 2256 291 229 9 55.6 % 2217 22.2 % >>12 Diep : 2227 165 291 9 44.4 % 2265 44.4 % >>13 IsiChess X : 2166 201 278 9 38.9 % 2245 33.3 % >>14 Tao : 2165 229 291 9 44.4 % 2203 22.2 % >>15 Ruy Lopez : 2118 366 266 9 33.3 % 2238 0.0 % >>16 Pharaon : 2082 169 266 9 33.3 % 2202 44.4 % >>17 SpiderGirl : 2014 213 255 9 27.8 % 2180 33.3 % >>18 XiNiX : 1724 400 108 9 5.6 % 2216 11.1 % >> >>congratulation also for the Deep Junior team for winning the event convincingly >>when the difference from the second place is almost 200 elo and the hardware >>explain less than 70 elo difference. >> >>Uri > >Here is the rating without one game Junior7-Ruy lopez >It seems that the program is not correct > >Junior won the game against Ruy lopez but without the game against Ruy lopez >Junior has bigger rating when Ruy lopez has lower rating. > >It is not logical. >It seems that I have to build my program > >I already did it in the past for a private case correctly and programs cannot >lose rating from winning games unless I have some logical error. > >I am surprised to see that programmers do correctly >the hard part of the program(doing it for the general case and not only for a >private case) and are wrong in the easy part(calculating elo based on the >results until conversion). > >I still believe that tiger has a better performance but I am not sure. >It was my impression before reading the results without running the program. > >Note that the difference between tiger and shredder is 36 points without the >game Junior-Ruy lopez and 33 points with this game so it seems that deleting >the game that is more accurate than including it with negative influence on >Junior only increase the difference. > >1 Deep Junior 7 : 2760 262 274 8 87.5 % 2422 25.0 % >2 Quest (DeepFritz) : 2556 266 169 9 66.7 % 2436 44.4 % >3 Chess Tiger 14.6 Gambit Tiger : 2506 291 229 9 55.6 % 2467 22.2 % >4 Crafty 18.10X : 2473 291 165 9 55.6 % 2434 44.4 % >5 Rebel : 2473 291 229 9 55.6 % 2434 22.2 % >6 Shredder : 2468 266 249 9 66.7 % 2348 22.2 % >7 Goliath : 2423 291 165 9 55.6 % 2384 44.4 % >8 Gromit 3.9.5 : 2369 278 201 9 61.1 % 2291 33.3 % >9 Ferret : 2363 291 229 9 55.6 % 2324 22.2 % >10 Gandalf 5.0 : 2311 291 229 9 55.6 % 2272 22.2 % >11 ParSOS : 2259 291 229 9 55.6 % 2220 22.2 % >12 Diep : 2230 165 291 9 44.4 % 2269 44.4 % >13 IsiChess X : 2167 201 278 9 38.9 % 2245 33.3 % >14 Tao : 2165 229 291 9 44.4 % 2204 22.2 % >15 Ruy Lopez : 2087 387 310 8 37.5 % 2176 0.0 % >16 Pharaon : 2081 169 266 9 33.3 % 2201 44.4 % >17 SpiderGirl : 2013 213 255 9 27.8 % 2179 33.3 % >18 XiNiX : 1723 400 108 9 5.6 % 2216 11.1 % > >Uri As a check, I did this experiment with my modified approach (for an explanation see my previous message 185367): 1) With the full pgn: Deep Junior's rating is 2829 2) Without the one Junior game: Deep Junior's rating is 2827.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.