Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Gotcha!

Author: Derrick Daniels

Date: 00:29:50 08/30/01

Go up one level in this thread


On August 29, 2001 at 17:39:43, Miguel A. Ballicora wrote:

>On August 29, 2001 at 14:36:18, Lonnie Cook wrote:
>
>>On August 29, 2001 at 11:44:05, Ritter Rost wrote:
>>
>>>On August 29, 2001 at 05:02:29, Derrick Daniels wrote:
>>>
>>>>On August 29, 2001 at 03:34:11, Sergei Smith wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>I see Ferret got good results during the championship.
>>>>>Is Ferret the new name of an old program like Quest is the new name of Fritz ?
>>>>>If Ferret is a new program, where is can you download it or order the CD ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Ferret is a very good Program, but I am afraid it has been surpassed, the
>>>>driving force of capitalism, has created the incentive for commercial
>>>>programmers do leave ferret in the dust, this was clearly demonstrated at the
>>>>last computer chess championship. Where money is not the driving force, there is
>>>>little progress, human nature i believe.
>>
>>First off I am not knocking Bruce's program at all. I do not even want to touch
>>the statements made as to show it in a bad light ...
>>
>>BUT
>>
>>I think there is a lot of truth here in these two statements,"Where money is not
>>the driving force, there is little progress, human nature i believe."
>
>Not at all!
>Look at the basic sciences for instance. The money is not the driving force
>and most the modern society is built upon those, even if you don't
>know it.
>Look at Hyatt's post describing the era of computer chess when there was a
>scientific (academic) interest in computer chess. The advances were huge.
>
>In fact, I would say the opposite is closer to the truth. When money
>enters in the equation there is a good chance that the creativity might
>be limited in one way or another. An idea or project may be good but it is
>cut off for reasons not related entirely to the subject.
>
>When money is the driving force, optimization has the best chance. But
>optimization is not the only way of progress...
>
>Regards,


>Miguel
>
>


  Look at the Deep blue kasparov match, the developement of Deep blue itself was
probally rooted in Money.




>
>
>>and the other statement, "...the driving force of captilalism, has created the
>>incentive for commercial programmers ..."
>>
>>unfortunately in my opinion this is true.
>>
>>How many programmers would push it that one extra week for the love of the code
>>
>>OR
>>
>>push it for a healthy paycheck
>>
>>as William Wordsworth wrote,
>>
>>"If his own eyes play false with him, these freaks
>>      Of fancy shall be quickly tamed by mine;
>>      The goal is reached. My Master shall become
>>      A shadow of myself--made by myself."
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>Whittington lives!



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.