Author: Peter Berger
Date: 16:10:29 09/08/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 08, 2001 at 18:38:39, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >On September 08, 2001 at 17:10:58, Eduard Nemeth wrote: > >>Of course: no takebacks!!! >> >>This game is not to belive , but it is true. :-( >> >>Frans Morsch, bitte tue endlich etwas gegen meine Killer! >> >>Wihtout comments this mate in 17 move: >> >>Fritz 6c - Nemeth,E [B01] >>Stufe=Blitz:30'. Stuttgart, 08.09.2001 >> >> 64MB, general.ctg. P600 >> 1.e4 d5 2.exd5 h5 3.Lb5+ 1.16/13 1:14 c6 4.dxc6 1.22/13 50 Sxc6 5.Sf3 >>1.22/14 2:06 Sh6 6.Sc3 1.44/12 1:50 g6 7.0-0 1.47/12 49 Lg4 8.h3 >>1.59/12 55 e6 9.hxg4 2.16/12 53 hxg4 10.Se5 1.78/11 29 Dh4 11.g3 >>1.16/10 24 Dh3 12.Sd5 -11.09/11 42 Sg8 13.Lxc6+ -#14/12 5 bxc6 14.Sc7+ >>-#4/7 0 Ke7 15.Sd5+ -#3/6 0 cxd5 16.Sxg6+ -#2/4 0 fxg6 17.d4 -#1/2 0 >>Dh1# 0-1 >> >>Good night, >>Eduard > >Hi Eduard, >Fritz needs a bit more time (30 seconds more...) to see you trap at move 9., >please let this comps thinks a bit more , be more fair with them... : > If Fritz was a human chessplayer you wouldn't get away with a comment like that :). It is a game in 30 and it is up to Fritz to manage its time well - there definitely would have been more time availlable to choose a better move. Also - I thought it was the other way around and computers were supposed to be relatively better at shorter time controls compaired to humans? pete
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.