Author: Uri Blass
Date: 16:25:41 09/08/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 08, 2001 at 19:10:29, Peter Berger wrote: >On September 08, 2001 at 18:38:39, Otello Gnaramori wrote: > >>On September 08, 2001 at 17:10:58, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >> >>>Of course: no takebacks!!! >>> >>>This game is not to belive , but it is true. :-( >>> >>>Frans Morsch, bitte tue endlich etwas gegen meine Killer! >>> >>>Wihtout comments this mate in 17 move: >>> >>>Fritz 6c - Nemeth,E [B01] >>>Stufe=Blitz:30'. Stuttgart, 08.09.2001 >>> >>> 64MB, general.ctg. P600 >>> 1.e4 d5 2.exd5 h5 3.Lb5+ 1.16/13 1:14 c6 4.dxc6 1.22/13 50 Sxc6 5.Sf3 >>>1.22/14 2:06 Sh6 6.Sc3 1.44/12 1:50 g6 7.0-0 1.47/12 49 Lg4 8.h3 >>>1.59/12 55 e6 9.hxg4 2.16/12 53 hxg4 10.Se5 1.78/11 29 Dh4 11.g3 >>>1.16/10 24 Dh3 12.Sd5 -11.09/11 42 Sg8 13.Lxc6+ -#14/12 5 bxc6 14.Sc7+ >>>-#4/7 0 Ke7 15.Sd5+ -#3/6 0 cxd5 16.Sxg6+ -#2/4 0 fxg6 17.d4 -#1/2 0 >>>Dh1# 0-1 >>> >>>Good night, >>>Eduard >> >>Hi Eduard, >>Fritz needs a bit more time (30 seconds more...) to see you trap at move 9., >>please let this comps thinks a bit more , be more fair with them... : >> > >If Fritz was a human chessplayer you wouldn't get away with a comment like that >:). > >It is a game in 30 and it is up to Fritz to manage its time well - there >definitely would have been more time availlable to choose a better move. > >Also - I thought it was the other way around and computers were supposed to be >relatively better at shorter time controls compaired to humans? > >pete No I believe that Humans are better at short time control against Fritz. The trojan horse sacrifice works often at short time control when it does not work often at long time control. There are things that humans know by knowledge when Fritz need search to see. At long time control it gets the search and at short time control it does not get the search time. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.