Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 16:13:13 09/12/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 12, 2001 at 18:38:07, Slater Wold wrote: >I tested Crafty against the 300 WAC positions, yesterday and today. > >The tests were run with 48M of hash, and 10M of hashp. Also all 5 piece TB were >in place, and the machine was a 2x1.4Ghz that gets roughly 1.41M nps on the >bench test. (That's with the hash. With nothing but smpmt 2, it gets 1.44M.) > >1 second = 275/300 (Interestly, Deep Shredder get 274/300 in this test.) > >3 seconds = 293/300 > >5 seconds = 294/300 > >10 seconds = 295/300 > >60 seconds = 296/300 WAC is a dumb test when you have a program at this level. You can throw out all but about 10 of them, and you still have something that's hard to use to test a program at a sensible time control, because the remainder are either too easy (still) or too hard. bruce > >Results from the 60 second test: > >total: 300 >total acd: 3675 mean total acd: 12.25 >total acn: -673005227 mean total acn: -2243350.76 >total acs: 13671 mean total acs: 45.57 >total mean node frequency: -49228.68 Hz >solve: 296 solve percent: 98.67 >solve acd: 3612 mean solve acd: 12.20 >solve acn: -1017101576 mean solve acn: -3436153.97 >solve acs: 13430 mean solve acs: 45.37 >solve mean node frequency: -75733.55 Hz >unsol: 4 unsol percent: 1.33 >unsol acd: 63 mean unsol acd: 15.75 >unsol acn: 344096349 mean unsol acn: 86024087.25 >unsol acs: 241 mean unsol acs: 60.25 >unsol mean node frequency: 1427785.68 Hz > >Bob had stated he had an Alpha 750mhz machine that got all 300 in 60 seconds. >Surely I am killing that machine in nps, and don't fully understand this. > >I also have the logs, if anyone is interested. > > >Slate
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.