Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Why is SMP not standard in chessprograms?

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 17:53:51 09/25/01

Go up one level in this thread


On September 25, 2001 at 20:13:53, Albert Silver wrote:
[snip]
>I'll argue with it. I doubt very much Deep Junior outsells plain ol' Junior. I
>also doubt very much that Deep Shredder outsold Shredder. I believe (no numbers
>unfortunately) they have sold less than Hiarcs, Tiger, and Nimzo for example. I
>am only speaking of the 'Deep' versions and not their single-cpu brothers that
>do well. The only exception I can think of _might_ (no numbers unfortunately) be
>Deep Fritz as it not only is an SMP version of Fritz 6, but also an improvement
>of it.

I rather suspect that soon everyone will have "Deep" versions, including
ChessMaster and the rest.  Of course, on most PC's they will run a bit *slower*
than non-SMP versions.

Reason:
Marketing hype -- since those marketing SMP versions will be crowing about how
great they are, and since "Deep" sounds like "Deep Blue" [which the average user
knows is strong enough to beat Kasparov] lots of people will flock to buy them
despite the fact that they will not improve performance with it.

I suspect that most people who buy it will have no idea that it requires
multiple CPU's for a performance boost.




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.