Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Why is SMP not standard in chessprograms?

Author: Slater Wold

Date: 18:02:41 09/25/01

Go up one level in this thread


On September 25, 2001 at 20:53:51, Dann Corbit wrote:

>On September 25, 2001 at 20:13:53, Albert Silver wrote:
>[snip]
>>I'll argue with it. I doubt very much Deep Junior outsells plain ol' Junior. I
>>also doubt very much that Deep Shredder outsold Shredder. I believe (no numbers
>>unfortunately) they have sold less than Hiarcs, Tiger, and Nimzo for example. I
>>am only speaking of the 'Deep' versions and not their single-cpu brothers that
>>do well. The only exception I can think of _might_ (no numbers unfortunately) be
>>Deep Fritz as it not only is an SMP version of Fritz 6, but also an improvement
>>of it.
>
>I rather suspect that soon everyone will have "Deep" versions, including
>ChessMaster and the rest.  Of course, on most PC's they will run a bit *slower*
>than non-SMP versions.
>
>Reason:
>Marketing hype -- since those marketing SMP versions will be crowing about how
>great they are, and since "Deep" sounds like "Deep Blue" [which the average user
>knows is strong enough to beat Kasparov] lots of people will flock to buy them
>despite the fact that they will not improve performance with it.
>
>I suspect that most people who buy it will have no idea that it requires
>multiple CPU's for a performance boost.

Speaking of which........

Seen the new IBM commercial?  They make the insinuation that their new PIV
models can beat, and I quote, "...russian chess players...."

Comparing a PIV to Deep Blue is like comparing a Yugo to John Force's Funny Car.
 They both have an engine, and wheels........but that's where the comparison
stops.


Slate



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.