Author: Mark Young
Date: 17:00:38 05/26/98
Go up one level in this thread
On May 26, 1998 at 19:29:31, Thorsten Czub wrote: >>b5 is correct: > >>Fritz5 found b5 after 32 minutes and 43 seconds in my computer >>pentium200Mh when it used 99,968 Kbytes hash tables >>the depth is 14 brute force and 43 selective > >Hiarcs6 changes from c4 into b5 after 29". And in 128" into Nc6 >(for Moritz and other materalists, thats 67.68 times faster, although >Hiarcs6 had only 32MB hash). > >Cstal 313a switches from c4 into Nc6 (same move Hiarcs6 likes) after >1175" (for Moritz: 1.67 times faster than >fritz5] > >MChess7.1 needs 45'24" to find Nc6. > >Rebel9 plays b5 after 1'28" (worth 22.30 Moritz) and changes after >1'45" into Nc6. > >>Junior4.6 could not find this move in one hour. > >>I do not like the fact fritz5 is a good program but I cannot ignore >facts. > >I do not ignore facts. As you can see: fast searchers need more time to >see through the above position. :-) > Wrong again. With just 10 mb of hash. Fritz 5 finds Nc6 at 0 sec.!! And sticks with it after 30 min. I tested Fritz with many hash settings and it never picked c4 at any time. The only moves it found were Nc6 and b5. >>They do not deserve to be a good program because they want to be >>number 1 by unfair means. > >I am different opinion. Fritz is a nice program. Frans and the ChessBase >team deserve any compliments. But in >chess, it is only weak. I don't think it is number one. And you are >right, their methods don't have my sympathy too. > > >>Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.