Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 16:29:31 05/26/98
Go up one level in this thread
>b5 is correct: >Fritz5 found b5 after 32 minutes and 43 seconds in my computer >pentium200Mh when it used 99,968 Kbytes hash tables >the depth is 14 brute force and 43 selective Hiarcs6 changes from c4 into b5 after 29". And in 128" into Nc6 (for Moritz and other materalists, thats 67.68 times faster, although Hiarcs6 had only 32MB hash). Cstal 313a switches from c4 into Nc6 (same move Hiarcs6 likes) after 1175" (for Moritz: 1.67 times faster than fritz5] MChess7.1 needs 45'24" to find Nc6. Rebel9 plays b5 after 1'28" (worth 22.30 Moritz) and changes after 1'45" into Nc6. >Junior4.6 could not find this move in one hour. >I do not like the fact fritz5 is a good program but I cannot ignore facts. I do not ignore facts. As you can see: fast searchers need more time to see through the above position. :-) >They do not deserve to be a good program because they want to be >number 1 by unfair means. I am different opinion. Fritz is a nice program. Frans and the ChessBase team deserve any compliments. But in chess, it is only weak. I don't think it is number one. And you are right, their methods don't have my sympathy too. >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.