Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 07:16:37 10/24/01
Go up one level in this thread
On October 23, 2001 at 13:12:38, Andrew Williams wrote:
hi here diep dual 1.2, under 500000 nodes to find Nxf6.
00:00 0 0 3 (0) 1 0.278 Ne4-d6
00:00 0 0 765 (0) 2 -3.860 Ne4-d6 Rd8xd6
++ e4-g5
00:00 0 0 871 (0) 2 -0.353 Ne4-g5 h7-h6
00:00 0 0 1230 (0) 3 -0.495 Ne4-g5 h7-h6 Ng5-f3
++ e4-g3
00:00 0 0 1693 (0) 3 -0.388 Ne4-g3 f7-f6 f2-f4
++ e4-d2
00:00 0 0 2055 (96) 3 -0.352 Ne4-d2 f7-f6 Rc3-h3
00:00 0 0 5254 (122) 4 -0.570 Ne4-d2 Qd5-d7 Rc3-h3 h7-h6
++ e4-g3
00:00 0 0 6334 (288) 4 -0.528 Ne4-g3 f7-f6 b2-b3 Qd5-d7
++ e4-d6
00:00 0 0 11563 (792) 4 0.679 Ne4-d6 Rd8xd6 Rc3-h3 Rf8-e8 e5xd6 Qd5xc4 d6xc7 Qc4
xa4 Qh5xh7 Kg8-f8
00:00 0 0 18596 (792) 5 0.679 Ne4-d6 Rd8xd6 Rc3-h3 Rf8-e8 e5xd6 Qd5xc4 d6xc7 Qc4
xa4 Qh5xh7 Kg8-f8
00:00 0 0 43119 (1306) 6 0.679 Ne4-d6 Rd8xd6 Rc3-h3 Rf8-e8 e5xd6 Qd5xc4 d6xc7 Qc
4xa4 Qh5xh7 Kg8-f8
00:01 0 0 111417 (8331) 7 0.679 Ne4-d6 Rd8xd6 Rc3-h3 Rf8-e8 e5xd6 Qd5xc4 d6xc7 Q
c4xa4 Qh5xh7 Kg8-f8
00:02 0 0 296357 (37301) 8 0.073 Ne4-d6 Rd8xd6 Rc3-h3 h7-h6 e5xd6 Qd5xc4 d6xe7 R
f8-e8 Qh5xa5
++ e4-f6
00:04 0 0 488650 (47559) 8 4.230 Ne4-f6 g7xf6 Rc3-g3 Ne7-g6 Rg3-h3 Ng6-h4 Qh5xh4
Rf8-e8 Qh4xh7 Kg8-f8 e5xf6
00:05 0 0 546706 (64166) 9 4.230 Ne4-f6 g7xf6 Rc3-g3 Ne7-g6 Rg3-h3 Ng6-h4 Qh5xh4
Rf8-e8 Qh4xh7 Kg8-f8 e5xf6
00:06 0 0 761974 (86333) 10 12.837 Ne4-f6 g7xf6 Rc3-g3 Ne7-g6 Rg3-h3 Ng6-h4 Qh5x
h4 Qd5-e4 Qh4xe4 f6-f5 Rh3-g3 Kg8-h8 Qe4-h4
00:09 0 0 1131355 (144422) 11 12.837 Ne4-f6 g7xf6 Rc3-g3 Kg8-h8 Qh5-h6 Ne7-g6 Rg
3-h3 Qd5xg2 Kg1xg2 Ng6-f4 Ne2xf4 Rf8-g8 Kg2-f3 Rg8-g7 e5xf6
00:21 0 0 2684390 (453893) 12 15.970 Ne4-f6 g7xf6 Rc3-g3 Ne7-g6 Rg3-h3 Ng6-h4 Qh
5xh4 Qd5-e4 Qh4xe4 f6-f5 Qe4-h4 Rf8-e8 Qh4xh7 Kg8-f8 Qh7-h6 Kf8-e7 Rc4xc6
00:33 0 0 4832334 (580006) 13 19.073 Ne4-f6 g7xf6 Rc3-g3 Kg8-h8 Qh5-h6 Ne7-g6 Rg
3-h3 Qd5xg2 Kg1xg2 Ng6-f4 Ne2xf4 Rf8-g8 Kg2-f3 Rg8-g7 e5xf6 Rd8-g8 f6xg7 Rg8xg7
Rc4xc6
01:05 0 0 9212310 (1210555) 14 19.957 Ne4-f6 g7xf6 Rc3-g3 Kg8-h8 Qh5-h6 Ne7-g6 R
g3-h3 Qd5xg2 Kg1xg2 Ng6-f4 Ne2xf4 Rf8-g8 Kg2-f3 Rg8-g7 e5xf6 Rd8-g8 Rc4xc6 Nc7-e
8 f6xg7 Rg8xg7 Rc6xb6
02:19 0 0 19270120 (2593426) 15 19.957 Ne4-f6 g7xf6 Rc3-g3 Kg8-h8 Qh5-h6 Ne7-g6
Rg3-h3 Qd5xg2 Kg1xg2 Ng6-f4 Ne2xf4 Rf8-g8 Kg2-f3 Rg8-g7 e5xf6 Rd8-g8 Rc4xc6 Nc7-
e8 f6xg7 Rg8xg7 Rc6xb6
07:19 0 0 56596996 (11538884) 16 22.608 Ne4-f6 g7xf6 Rc3-g3 Kg8-h8 Qh5-h6 Ne7-g6
Rg3-h3 Qd5xg2 Kg1xg2 Ng6-f4 Ne2xf4 Rf8-g8 Kg2-f1 Rg8-g7 e5xf6 Rd8-g8 f6xg7 Rg8x
g7 Rc4xc6 b6-b5
16:31 0 0 126213046 (19865894) 17 24.790 Ne4-f6 g7xf6 Rc3-g3 Kg8-h8 Qh5-h6 Ne7-g
6 Rg3-h3 Qd5xg2 Kg1xg2 Ng6-h4 Kg2-h1 Rf8-g8 Qh6xh4 Rg8-g7 e5xf6 Rd8-g8 Rc4xc6 Rg
7-g2
40:20 0 0 305867223 (41386476) 18 28.206 Ne4-f6 g7xf6 Rc3-g3 Kg8-h8 Qh5-h6 Ne7-g
6 Rg3-h3 Qd5xg2 Kg1xg2 Ng6-f4 Ne2xf4 Rf8-g8 Kg2-f3 Rg8-g7 e5xf6 Rd8-g8 f6xg7 Rg8
xg7 Nf4-h5 Nc7-e8 Nh5xg7
>Hi,
>
>My program lost this game against a crafty clone on ICC recently:
>
>[Event "ICS rated blitz match"]
>[Site "204.178.125.65"]
>[Date "2001.10.21"]
>[Round "-"]
>[White "MoonShot"]
>[Black "PostModernist"]
>[Result "1-0"]
>[WhiteElo "2859"]
>[BlackElo "2772"]
>[TimeControl "600+2"]
>
>1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 c6 3. Nc3 e6 4. e4 Bb4 5. Bd3 d5 6. e5 dxc4 7. Bxc4 Nd5 8.
>Ne2 b6 9. O-O O-O 10. Qd3 Be7 11. Bd2 Bb7 12. Qg3 Kh8 13. Ne4 Ba6 14. Rac1
>Bxc4 15. Rxc4 Qd7 16. Bg5 Na6 17. Bxe7 Nxe7 18. Nd6 Nc7 19. Rfc1 Rad8 20.
>Qf3 Ne8 21. Ne4 Kg8 22. Qh3 a5 23. a4 Nc7 24. Qg4 Kh8 25. Qh5 Kg8 26. R1c3
>Qd5 27. Nf6+ gxf6 28. Rg3+ Kh8 29. Qh6 Ng6 30. Rh3
>{PostModernist resigns} 1-0
>
>
>The move 27.Nf6+ wins everything immediately. MoonShot (crafty 18.12
>on a K7 1.33GHz) found that in 14 seconds (albeit with hash-tables
>already full). With some fiddling about with null move rules, PM can
>find it in 37 seconds from a "standing start" (K7 1.2GHz). I'd be
>interested to know how other programs do on this.
>
>[D]3r1rk1/2n1nppp/1pp1p3/p2qP2Q/P1RPN3/2R5/1P2NPPP/6K1 w - - bm Nf6
>
>
>Regards
>
>Andrew
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.