Author: Jonas Cohonas
Date: 06:09:04 11/08/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 08, 2001 at 09:05:53, Odd Gunnar Malin wrote: >On November 08, 2001 at 07:54:59, Jonas Cohonas wrote: > >>On November 08, 2001 at 06:59:22, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >> >>>On November 08, 2001 at 06:35:18, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >>> >>>>Can anyone here beat the "best" prog in 40/120 without using anti comp >>>>strtegies? on atleast an Athlon 1000? >>>> >>>>I have seen a lot of post where people draw the comps when trying to do nothing >>>>but that, but i am yet to see someone not using anti comp strategies beat them >>>>in a 40/120 on fast hardware..... anyone up for the challenge? >>> >>>What's the point of not playing anticomputer strategies? >>> >>>-- >>>GCP >> >>The point being: 1. A GM of conciderable strength would not play anti comp. >>2.If a program has a fault which can be taken advantage of by using anti comp >>strategies making it look like a 2000 player there is no point in playing it, > >>just like using the same line to beat the comp to determine it's strength. > >Booklearning? > >A guess most of the top engines play anti-computer then :) > >Odd Gunnar Anti comp play does rarely follow an ECO code. Regards Jonas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.