Author: Odd Gunnar Malin
Date: 06:05:53 11/08/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 08, 2001 at 07:54:59, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >On November 08, 2001 at 06:59:22, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>On November 08, 2001 at 06:35:18, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >> >>>Can anyone here beat the "best" prog in 40/120 without using anti comp >>>strtegies? on atleast an Athlon 1000? >>> >>>I have seen a lot of post where people draw the comps when trying to do nothing >>>but that, but i am yet to see someone not using anti comp strategies beat them >>>in a 40/120 on fast hardware..... anyone up for the challenge? >> >>What's the point of not playing anticomputer strategies? >> >>-- >>GCP > >The point being: 1. A GM of conciderable strength would not play anti comp. >2.If a program has a fault which can be taken advantage of by using anti comp >strategies making it look like a 2000 player there is no point in playing it, >just like using the same line to beat the comp to determine it's strength. Booklearning? A guess most of the top engines play anti-computer then :) Odd Gunnar
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.