Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 06:30:08 11/08/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 08, 2001 at 08:58:30, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >And i could say: if your wordplay was what i said ( transformed into your words) >then you are right, but the objective was: can anyone beat one of the best progs >at 40/120 on fast hardware, without anti comp play? >The term anti comp is there for a reason and most people know what i am talking >about when i say anti comp. No they do not, because it isn't clearly defined as I've written quite a few times by now. >Actually conditions as a term is quite subjective and requires some willingness >to accept that the conditions might not be ones own defenition, everything is >relative even when attemted to be put into perspective mogens ;) Not in this case. Your challenge doesn't make any sense whatsoever. Regards, Mogens
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.