Author: Jonas Cohonas
Date: 07:07:06 11/08/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 08, 2001 at 09:30:08, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On November 08, 2001 at 08:58:30, Jonas Cohonas wrote: > >>And i could say: if your wordplay was what i said ( transformed into your words) >>then you are right, but the objective was: can anyone beat one of the best progs >>at 40/120 on fast hardware, without anti comp play? >>The term anti comp is there for a reason and most people know what i am talking >>about when i say anti comp. > >No they do not, because it isn't clearly defined as I've written quite a few >times by now. > >>Actually conditions as a term is quite subjective and requires some willingness >>to accept that the conditions might not be ones own defenition, everything is >>relative even when attemted to be put into perspective mogens ;) > >Not in this case. Your challenge doesn't make any sense whatsoever. > >Regards, >Mogens What part of: Can anyone here beat a comp at 40/120 without using anticomp strategies on fast hardware, don't you understand?? Regards Jonas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.