Author: Uri Blass
Date: 09:45:31 11/08/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 08, 2001 at 11:00:31, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >On November 08, 2001 at 10:41:01, Jonas Cohonas wrote: > >>On November 08, 2001 at 10:39:17, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On November 08, 2001 at 10:26:41, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >>> >>>>On November 08, 2001 at 09:43:05, José Carlos wrote: >>>> >>>>>On November 08, 2001 at 09:13:13, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On November 08, 2001 at 09:06:11, José Carlos wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On November 08, 2001 at 08:58:30, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On November 08, 2001 at 08:41:16, Mogens Larsen wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On November 08, 2001 at 08:33:09, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>I said the requirements of the challenge was objective, not that the definition >>>>>>>>>>of anti comp play was clearly defined objectively!! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>If you by requirements mean conditions, then you clearly listed "no anti-comp" >>>>>>>>>play as a condition. So the requirements cannot be said to be objective. Unless >>>>>>>>>you by requirement means conditions minus "no anti-comp play" ;-). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Regards, >>>>>>>>>Mogens >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>And i could say: if your wordplay was what i said ( transformed into your words) >>>>>>>>then you are right, but the objective was: can anyone beat one of the best progs >>>>>>>>at 40/120 on fast hardware, without anti comp play? >>>>>>>>The term anti comp is there for a reason and most people know what i am talking >>>>>>>>about when i say anti comp. >>>>>>>>Actually conditions as a term is quite subjective and requires some willingness >>>>>>>>to accept that the conditions might not be ones own defenition, everything is >>>>>>>>relative even when attemted to be put into perspective mogens ;) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Regards >>>>>>>>Jonas >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Can you define anti comp play? I'd be willing to play if I knew what are you >>>>>>>talking about. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> José C. >>>>>> >>>>>>The question is not if i can define anti comp play, but if anyone here following >>>>>>a known mainline that leads to some equality, can beat one of the top 5 progs in >>>>>>40/120 conditions (on fast hardware) for example: would you be willing to play a >>>>>>comp using the first 3 moves of Ruy Lopez under the above mentioned conditions? >>>>>> >>>>>>Regards >>>>>>Jonas >>>>> >>>>> If after the first 3 moves of Ruy López I am free to play whatever moves I >>>>>want, I'll play. Of course I can't say for sure I'm gonna win (I'm under FIDE >>>>>2200 right now), but I will try. How do you plan to set such a game? On ICC? >>>>> José C. >>>> >>>>We can do this at the F7 server in a couple of days using the first 3 moves of >>>>Ruy lopez 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3Bb5.... >>>> >>>>You can choose color, and play whatever you want beyond that line. >>> >>>I believe that Nemeth won this against chess programs by 3...h5 >>> >>>Uri >> >>Was that on equal hardware, 40/120? >> >>Regards >>Jonas > >By equal i mean: 1.3 Ghz Athlon No I believe that nemeth never played 120/40 against programs on 1.3 Ghz athlon or similiar hardware. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.