Author: Don Dailey
Date: 20:12:26 05/31/98
Go up one level in this thread
>>>>While I agree with you that it is a personal attack, I think that the >>>>complaint must come from the person attacked before moderation is >>>>considered. >> >>NO! I absolutely disagree. In Ed's case, it was quickly handled by >>Ed himself and quickly resolved. This is great and no moderation >>is required. >> >>But what if Ed never complained and the guy never stopped? What >>if two members get into a heated argument and launch an all out >>war against each other but never make a formal complaint? >> >>Isn't the natural reaction of many to just react? Just because >>Ed handled the matter with great maturity does not mean others >>will. >> >>No, the principle should be just as Enrique proposed, to avoid >>personal attacks as our first priority. >> >>- Don > >There is a lot of IF's there. In this case the way it happend. Ed did >the right thing. Im sure if the IF'S had happend. Ed or someone else >would take diffrent steps. Then I would also agree with you. Lot's of "if's" strengthen my case. I did not chain them together. It is clear you are not a programmer. But it seems I am a detective! - Don
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.