Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 05:02:23 11/12/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 12, 2001 at 06:22:04, Uri Blass wrote: >This position could happen in my crrespondence game > >[D]2r2rk1/p3q1pp/1p6/2bp1p2/4n3/1P2P1P1/PB3PBP/1QR1RbK1 w - - 0 25 > >If your program plays Bxe4 then it is materialistic(Bxe4 is the only move that >does not lose material) > >If it plays Rxf1 then it is not materialistic > >It seems that most programs are not materialistic based on the test that I did. >I guess also that most humans are not materialistic here and are going to prefer >Rxf1 > >Uri Sjeng plays Bxe4 here. The difference between that and Rxf1 is 0.20 pawns. Basically, it does not believe f3 is a significant enough weakness if black does not have the right bishop. Is being materialistic intrinsically 'bad' here? -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.