Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: A test position to see if your program is materialistic(most are not)

Author: Gordon Rattray

Date: 05:59:22 11/12/01

Go up one level in this thread


On November 12, 2001 at 08:53:28, Uri Blass wrote:

[snip]

>
>One of the players who lost against me(Abir Har aven) is in the top 200(ICCF
>rating of 2587)
>
>I believe that my performance in the final is not enough to challenge Timerman.
>
>It is only almost 2700(I calculate it by adding 250 elo to the average of the
>rating of my opponents)
>
>2587,2516,2501,2488,2466,2372,2322,2295 are the ICCF rating of my opponents in
>the final when I am the only unrated player because this tournament is the first
>tournament of me that is considered for ICCF rating.
>
>Uri


I don't know much about high level correspondence chess...

Do you think that corr. World Champs rely heavily on computers?  How much better
do you think they are compared to a weak player who solely relies on computer
assistance?

How does the quality of the games compare to standard championships, e.g.
Kasparov vs Karpov or Kramnik?

Gordon



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.