Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Commercial program strength vs. amateur program strength

Author: Tom Kerrigan

Date: 14:58:11 12/20/01

Go up one level in this thread


On December 20, 2001 at 14:15:43, Christophe Theron wrote:

>On December 20, 2001 at 14:06:04, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>
>>On December 20, 2001 at 13:38:33, Christophe Theron wrote:
>>
>>>On December 20, 2001 at 13:30:11, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>>
>>>>On December 20, 2001 at 12:59:13, Scott Gasch wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Crafty is an exception it could easily be sold and converted to commercial, just
>>>>take a look at this match:
>>>>
>>>>http://www.icdchess.com/forums/1/message.shtml?202622
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Sorry but these matches show Crafty losing badly against all top commercial
>>>programs...
>>>
>>>
>>>    Christophe
>>
>>
>>But there are some commercial programs inside of the Young Talents CD that don't
>>have a chance against Crafty.
>
>
>
>So they should not be commercial. I was talking about top commercial programs.
>
>If you are taking the worst commercial programs as a reference, you can indeed
>prove anything.
>
>
>
>    Christophe

That sure is a stupid definition of a commercial program, i.e., "what Christophe
thinks should be commercial."

-Tom



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.