Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 07:39:16 06/14/98
Go up one level in this thread
On June 14, 1998 at 04:03:51, blass uri wrote: >you cannot see in the games thorsten posted that hxg5 is a mistake >without a search and if you have an evaluation function that say it >without search your program >can do mistakes in sacrificing when the opponent takes the material >and the initiative for it is not enough. > >Uri Thats typical. You reduce the games on hxg. But the problems came much earlier. This have all 3 games in common. Black oversaw major positional rules. And I can name them to you if you don't know. I can make a list. In the same way you say NO EVALUATION can see that hxg is shit, I can tell you that no search will find out that these positional blunders are shit. So ! How can we come together. Not with you all denying that these "positional" mistakes are real ! Or that they don't care you. If you really believe in your ideology about these topics, than I am pleased to follow the development of your programs on the next championships and other tournaments. It will not work than. Overseeing major positional stuff will not lead a program to win. When 5K would have no chance against 300K, this is what some people say, and what I cannot reproduce, because cstal HAS a high chance to win against Fritz, why e.g. was Gandalf able to kill Fritz ? Gandalf was a slow program in the old days (before Jakarta) and was easily able to kill Fritz. I have sent the games to chessBase. Why do you deny things ? Why do you oversee facts ? Why do you want to be blind towards positional things ?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.