Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: more examples for search-based stupidity

Author: Mark Young

Date: 09:02:33 06/14/98

Go up one level in this thread


On June 13, 1998 at 23:53:34, Hristo wrote:

>On June 13, 1998 at 23:19:24, Mark Young wrote:
>
>>On June 13, 1998 at 23:05:00, Hristo wrote:
>>
>>>I understand, perfectly, what you are talking about!
>>>
>>>>>Can you name one program(or computer) that can predict(calculate) every
>>>>>possible move from the very beginig of the game unitl the very last move
>>>>
>>>>yes given the time, most programs can, if they don't have a ply cut off
>>>>point that is to low. :)
>>>
>>>I've tried Rebel, Fritz5 and crafty and all of them have very similar
>>>problems.
>>>I've done test where even after 48 hours of "thinking" the programs were
>>>unable to find the best possible move. Since none of the programs
>>>performs a full search on the possible postitions there is a cut-off
>>>reason to not evaluate a branch ... cut-off a branch here and there and
>>>your tree doesn't give you enough information about the position! If one
>>>evaluates ALL possible moves and builds a full tree with no cut-offs
>>>then it will work. Just how long shall we wait until this happens??
>>>
>>>About your comparison of Fritz and CST ... what is your point? One of
>>>them works different than the other!? Very well, thats great! Somebody
>>>has got enough "balls" to not follow the "gray creek" no matter how
>>>appealing it might seem.
>>>
>>>I've never seen CST so I don't know how well it plays!
>>>
>>What is the point in talking to you. If you don't even understand this
>>joke. LOL :):):). 48 hours. 10^48 hours may not be enough time. Since
>>you just cut off my real point I guess you still don't understand that
>>either.
>>
>
>Mark you are so funny ... I need to visit the doctor for stomach aches
>...
>Why do you talk at all Mark?!
>What is your point Mark?! 10^x hours will eventualy be enough!!! This is
>heck of a point!!! You can take it to the bank, but I'm afraid they will
>not see your point either.
>You can state the "bleeding" obvious until one day somebody wakes you up
>... hopefully you will not be too old~
>
Like a poor marksmen you keep missing the target. Go back and read the
other post for understanding. I will not keep repeating it to you. You
want to argue about nothing. And its a waste of time.



>
>Hristo
>
>
>>>
>>>Hristo



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.