Author: Thomas Lagershausen
Date: 10:25:16 02/18/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 18, 2002 at 13:03:08, Volker Pittlik wrote: >On February 18, 2002 at 12:27:05, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >...[snip] >> >>It is basically "the kind of chess playing I like" where "I like" is very >>vague and non-specific. :) >> > >To be a little bit more accurate it means: > >a) It is different to the way of playing chess anyone else like it _and_ >b) Someone who don't agree with me is to stupid to get my ideas. > >Best regards > >Volker All this statements doesn´t show a healthy abiltiy to go in a deeper discussion.A clother look to the history of chess gives a clearer view in this stuff.There are some chessschools like the Tal-epoch in which the understanding of chess a different approach established as the more materialistic one in the regulare chessbooks.The struggle of this ideas continues in the computerchess 40 years later.Why is this history fact so difficult to understand?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.