Author: José Carlos
Date: 12:40:51 02/18/02
Go up one level in this thread
Reading your post I see:
- You have no definition of the 'new paradigm'; just some romantic ideas but
nothing concrete. I have nothing against romantic ideas, I must say, but they
are not enough to define a paradigm.
- Chris differentiates in his post:
* Fast search * Heavy prunning
* Light eval vs * Careful eval
* Static only eval * Dynamic eval
* SEARCH * EVAL
Chris' own words:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The new paradigm differs from the classical by one simple conceptual switch.
The classical paradigm makes fast and simple evaluation at each node and
generates intelligence from the search tree. The classical programmer
looks for ways to make his search more efficient and his evaluation
function simpler and faster. The 'looking-glass' paradigm makes slow and
complex evaluations at each node and prefers to prune the search tree by
use of this evaluation function.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
So, according to Chris, most today's program are new paradigm, and specially
DIEP. Please, correct me if I'm wrong.
José C.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.