Author: Peter Berger
Date: 13:01:02 02/18/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 18, 2002 at 15:40:51, José Carlos wrote: > Reading your post I see: > > - You have no definition of the 'new paradigm'; just some romantic ideas but >nothing concrete. I have nothing against romantic ideas, I must say, but they >are not enough to define a paradigm. > - Chris differentiates in his post: > > * Fast search * Heavy prunning > * Light eval vs * Careful eval > * Static only eval * Dynamic eval > * SEARCH * EVAL > > Chris' own words: > >---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >The new paradigm differs from the classical by one simple conceptual switch. >The classical paradigm makes fast and simple evaluation at each node and >generates intelligence from the search tree. The classical programmer >looks for ways to make his search more efficient and his evaluation >function simpler and faster. The 'looking-glass' paradigm makes slow and >complex evaluations at each node and prefers to prune the search tree by >use of this evaluation function. >---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > So, according to Chris, most today's program are new paradigm, and specially >DIEP. Please, correct me if I'm wrong. > > José C. Thanks. That was the first post about the "new paradigm" I was able to understand. It seems there is still hope for me :) pete
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.