Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 01:52:23 02/19/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 19, 2002 at 03:48:43, Uri Blass wrote: >Relax :-)) >Thorsten did not say that you do not need to work hard to be in the top. >Thorsten did not say that the program need to be one of the best in order to be >considered as new paradigm. exactly. CSTal was not one of the tops before chris invented the tal-function. Complete chess system played very horrible. it had a wrong evaluation function. we worked on this. the result was chess system tal (dos). >Note also that beating the top programs from the relevant position is not enough >to be one of the top programs because if your program knows to play well in this >position and does not know to play well in other positions then it >is not one of the best programs. the position from knaak is from thomas lagershausen. i used it for my own testing purposes because it is a typical example of an unbalanced position in chess. and it is NOT so obvious from the beginning if the position is better for white or for black. it needs creativity to play the game. i liked the position. therefore i used it. and i thougt others like it too. >I may join the discussion if it is about the games otherwise I am out of it. > >Uri are they anyhow interested in the games ? they are only interested in trolling and stalking.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.