Author: Uri Blass
Date: 05:46:18 03/14/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 14, 2002 at 07:49:26, Sergei Smith wrote: >Hooray Shredder whipped The King ! >or >Hooray The King was whipped by Shredder !! > >The King played at top strength in the most favorable circumstances while >Shredder wasn't. Why do you assume that the king played at top strength when the results suggest that it did not. > >80 games ain't much to say something conclusive but the result is conclusive : >DeepShredderIBUCI - The King 75.5 - 4.5 Your result is illogical. Shredder may be better than chessmaster(I do not know) but 75.5-4.5 is illogical result. I suspect that you did not use chessmaster in it's strongest setting (I do not have chessmaster8000 but I know about chessmaster6000 that you need to tell it that you are bobby fisher or something like that in order to get the strongest settting(otherwise it assumes that you are not interested in the strongest setting)) Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.