Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: What are the ELO'S of the programmers that post here?

Author: Marc van Hal

Date: 14:41:49 03/14/02

Go up one level in this thread


On March 14, 2002 at 09:41:43, Christophe Theron wrote:

>On March 13, 2002 at 12:29:09, Marc van Hal wrote:
>
>>Century contest.(Which I by the way already had created before the end of the
>>contest including some other stronger settings.)
>
>
>
>BTW I'm still waiting for you to send me the CT15 settings.
>
>You know that people are waiting for it. Once I get it, I will say that the work
>is mine and not yours and will sell it under the name Chess Tiger 15.
>
>So please hurry, I have a deadline!
>
>
>    Christophe ;)
>Well as a matter of fact i do have improved settings for Alexander
Now called alexan4 but it is based on null move and some other tricks i found in
rebel settings
But I don't know if you could be helped by it.
Otherway of programing techniks I think.
It looks like a crossing of Alexander and Rebel anti GM
And I used Nulmove methode because I went sick of all these long games While
mate could be anounced for a long time.
Maybe tigers alogo rythme could solve this problem so it can run in deepest
search methode again.
My Alexan3 settings
So I can give you a tip same settings and some logic  advanced settings are
changed
You could ask ED Where these settings stands for
And how you can implent them in Tiger.
This are settings for gambittiger then not tiger.
So I always are up for helping people.
(Or a fool keep on having trust in human kind.)
Though I admit the help must look vague to you now
It might help.


But on the other hand hiding the real brain is never a good thing.
He gets fustrated and stops working on a project.
And you always might need him in the future!
Even on marketing bases it is not good giving him a part for the money
puts you in the opertunety to release a program each half year.
What about that?

Many losses of computers versus Human could have been avoided because I posted
deep analyses from these games in the past.
And now still people are only speculating about these positions.
(Well and most of my best postings are deleted from the archives.)
This exactly shows the stupidety of hidding the brain behind it!
(I certainly was not going to post my analyses again.)
You might have asked Bagriov where he did get his analyses
From the queens gambit exchanged.
And where the mistake was in these analyses.
And Forgeting I posted the same analyses.
and 1 day later the improved version of these analyses.
Actualy the improvement was not playing for a mineurety atack because White
could not get a real advantage by doing so.
 but on the centre With rookae1
>Or Khalifman playing a line from the Junior book also one of my analyses and not knowing what the plan was behind it.
Missing the most important move of that line Bf3! It was a Sicilian I should
have to look it up too give the precise position.
I know it was just after he became world champion.
Dificult to find after the board I admit no program plays it neither.
The position of Adams Anand Linares 2002 Nxd7 was a novelty  yeah right.
Just showing the stupidety of people who think they are smart
By using other peoples work without making it public,or later have contact with
him about it.
In all the time I posted and sended my work
I recieved several emails from Jeroen Noomen back then we where on a good foot
with each other.
And 1 email from Boris Alterman.
About a Kings Indian Gligoric  position where he did send me why the Fritz setup
was not corect.
I later on changed this line for this reason.
And believe me the time that I was filled with anger because of it are long
over.
Which fustrated me the most was not as much of the fact I did get not the credit
But more of the fact I thought My analyses where save on the icd server
And lost many of them because of this.
Inventing the wheel twice is a fustrating job to do.
When I made them the first time I made them with love
When I made them the second time I went fustrated because I did not find the
corect moves at once.

>>
>>Regards Marc



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.