Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: What are the ELO'S of the programmers that post here?

Author: Marc van Hal

Date: 14:44:07 03/14/02

Go up one level in this thread


On March 14, 2002 at 17:41:49, Marc van Hal wrote:

>On March 14, 2002 at 09:41:43, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>On March 13, 2002 at 12:29:09, Marc van Hal wrote:
>>
>>>Century contest.(Which I by the way already had created before the end of the
>>>contest including some other stronger settings.)
>>
>>
>>
>>BTW I'm still waiting for you to send me the CT15 settings.
>>
>>You know that people are waiting for it. Once I get it, I will say that the work
>>is mine and not yours and will sell it under the name Chess Tiger 15.
>>
>>So please hurry, I have a deadline!
>>
>>
>>    Christophe ;)
>>Well as a matter of fact i do have improved settings for Alexander
>Now called alexan4 but it is based on null move and some other tricks i found in
>rebel settings
>But I don't know if you could be helped by it.
>Otherway of programing techniks I think.
>It looks like a crossing of Alexander and Rebel anti GM
>And I used Nulmove methode because I went sick of all these long games While
>mate could be anounced for a long time.
>Maybe tigers alogo rythme could solve this problem so it can run in deepest
>search methode again.
>My Alexan3 settings
>So I can give you a tip same settings and some logic  advanced settings are
>changed
>You could ask ED Where these settings stands for
>And how you can implent them in Tiger.
>This are settings for gambittiger then not tiger.
>So I always are up for helping people.
>(Or a fool keep on having trust in human kind.)
>Though I admit the help must look vague to you now
>It might help.
>
>
>But on the other hand hiding the real brain is never a good thing.
>He gets fustrated and stops working on a project.
>And you always might need him in the future!
>Even on marketing bases it is not good giving him a part for the money
>puts you in the opertunety to release a program each half year.
>What about that?
>
>Many losses of computers versus Human could have been avoided because I posted
>deep analyses from these games in the past.
>And now still people are only speculating about these positions.
>(Well and most of my best postings are deleted from the archives.)
>This exactly shows the stupidety of hidding the brain behind it!
>(I certainly was not going to post my analyses again.)
>You might have asked Bagriov where he did get his analyses
>From the queens gambit exchanged.
>And where the mistake was in these analyses.
>And Forgeting I posted the same analyses.
>and 1 day later the improved version of these analyses.
>Actualy the improvement was not playing for a mineurety atack because White
>could not get a real advantage by doing so.
> but on the centre With rookae1
>>Or Khalifman playing a line from the Junior book also one of my analyses and not knowing what the plan was behind it.
>Missing the most important move of that line Bf3! It was a Sicilian I should
>have to look it up too give the precise position.
>I know it was just after he became world champion.
>Dificult to find after the board I admit no program plays it neither.
>The position of Adams Anand Linares 2002 Nxd7 was a novelty  yeah right.
>Just showing the stupidety of people who think they are smart
>By using other peoples work without making it public,or later have contact with
>him about it.
>In all the time I posted and sended my work
>I recieved several emails from Jeroen Noomen back then we where on a good foot
>with each other.
>And 1 email from Boris Alterman.
>About a Kings Indian Gligoric  position where he did send me why the Fritz setup
>was not corect.
>I later on changed this line for this reason.
>And believe me the time that I was filled with anger because of it are long
>over.
>Which fustrated me the most was not as much of the fact I did get not the credit
>But more of the fact I thought My analyses where save on the icd server
>And lost many of them because of this.
>Inventing the wheel twice is a fustrating job to do.
>When I made them the first time I made them with love
>When I made them the second time I went fustrated because I did not find the
>corect moves at once.
>
>>>
>>>Regards Marc

Ps this was the ending of the old cow.




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.