Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: To win the wc of computerchess means nothing.

Author: Vincent Diepeveen

Date: 19:30:48 03/21/02

Go up one level in this thread


On March 21, 2002 at 19:21:22, Amir Ban wrote:

>On March 21, 2002 at 17:52:36, Thomas Lagershausen wrote:
>
>>DJ7 is worldchampion of computerchess.Todays game  against Gulko shows that this
>>means nothing. When the program had to play against a human player completly
>>other things are important to play a highrated game.Junior is the weakest
>>program in the competion against Gulko.Gulko had played real antichess today but
>>DeepJunior7 canĀ“t improve the own position.The opposite was the case.It weakens
>>the own kingside with pawn h4? and h5? and makes senseless moves with the rooks
>>and the knights.So we have another example that ratinglists of computerchess are
>>far away from the reality.
>>
>>TL
>
>I believe the h4, h5 manoeuvre is a good one.
>
>Amir

Thomas posting shows how important for sales games versus
humans are. Even if kasparov would play 1.g4 2.f4 against your program,
the winning program would still be called "world champion" level,
whatever the name of the program...

Thomas obviously knows very little about computerchess.

Best regards,
Vincent





This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.